ACTION IN QUO WARRANTO ..Another Avenue of Attack in Pennsylvania

Action in Quo Warranto allows you to challenge the authority of a public official to take certain actions. More coming soon- when the results are in to the one this author is doing- as it is rarely done. It can also be used to challenge the authority of a person's qualifications to hold public office- gee.. this could be used to remove half the judges in the state!

I am using it against a judge.. so stay tuned folks!

Montgomery County - Judge Kelly C. Wall

UPDATE:  January 18, 2014 - In August of 2013, thirty days after seven-year divorce litigant, Diane Gochin, spoke before members of the Judicial Conduct Board in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania- Judge Kelly Wall recused.  She illegally ruled over the case for four years, issuing 30 orders that financially ruined the litigant.  As Judge Wall admitted to having a conflict of interest, her orders now must be vacated.  However, there appears to be no precedent case law in Pennsylvania regarding this , so it will be an uphill battle, as the bar association has a vested interest in defeating this Motion for Declaratory Relief, and will  probably be going to the PA Supreme Court.  This judge absolutely broke every rule of conduct and must be impeached.

Kelly C. Wall ran for the Judiciary in 2009. She got her legal degree later in life, and had less than ten full years of experience.which is the requirement. .She may have held her license for ten years, but she did not have litigation experience. Dockets in Bucks County and Montgomery County, PA show that Wall had only handled custody hearings. She clearly misrepresented her expertise in the law. She is presiding now over complex litigation, and her incompetence has caused massive damage to many families in Montgomery County. Furthermore, after a serious abuse of discretion consisting of discriminatory remarks in one case- it was also discovered that she had concealed campaign contributions from the opposing party's attorney, even after being confronted in court.

Why Repeal Pennsylvania Constitution Article V Sect 10 (C)?

The goal of this site is to enlighten citizens of the State of Pennsylvania, and other affected States, to the root of the judicial system crisis we now face. Honest people are losing their assets, their children and their freedom- due to the racketeering and organized crime- that has taken over the American legal system.

The 'justice' system  has been perverted into a commerce system- as a result of a very specific mistake in legislation. In 1968, a "constitutional convention" was held in Pennsylvania by a group of lawyers- and Proposition 7 was passed amending the State Constitution with Article V.  The Supreme Court interpreted the Statute as giving themselves self-regulatory powers and the right to pass their own rules without interference from the legislature.  This is a complete violation of the U.S. Constitution which mandates that only Congress can pass laws. It also effectively usurped the checks and balance system between the branches of government, which is the keystone to a democratic system.   Approximately 22 other States passed similar legislation around this time.