Pennsylvania Civil Rights Law Network Challenges Lawyers' Rights to First Amendment Protections

Pennsylvania Civil Rights Law Network Challenges Lawyers' Rights to First Amendment Protections

PCRLN meets with Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board

Through the efforts of Diane Gochin of the Pennsylvania Civil Rights Law Network (PCRLN), the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board (JCB) agreed to meet with her and Andy Ostrowski on June 7, 2013, concerning petitions sent to the JCB on behalf of a dozen Pennsylvania citizens from across the Commonwealth, concerning inaction and dismissal of meritorious complaints of judicial misconduct. Diane had requested a joint meeting with the other Pennsylvanians who petitioned the JCB for action, but the Board agreed to meet only with her at this time.
SEE FULL REPORT HERE

Its Easier to Become a Judge Than A Beautician in PA

Its Easier to Become a Judge than a Beautician in PAIts Easier to Become a Judge than a Beautician in PA

Complaint to the Judicial Conduct Board of the PA Supreme Court as a Result of the June 7, 2013 Meeting

“You cannot solve problems with the same level of consciousness that created them”  Albert Einstein

 

 

 TO THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD

OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Pennsylvania Judicial Center
601 Commonwealth Ave, Suite 3500
P.O. Box 62525
Harrisburg, Pa 17120-0901

In Complaint Against:  JUDGE DEFENDANT1 AND JUDGE DEFENDANT2

Montgomery County CASE

July 8, 2013
 

Statement to Review Committee

This is a resubmission of two judicial complaints, by invitation of the Judicial Conduct Board, at the meeting  of June 7, 2013 with Plaintiff Diane Gochin.  It is requested that it be given priority, because this case has been allowed to unjustifiably fester into its seventh year.  Plaintiff is further requesting that a written opinion be provided to her, by each Board member, justifying their decisions, and to validate that it will receive a full  review by qualified individuals.  Specific issues need to be addressed such as judicial orders being inconsistent with the record, statutes not being applied when mandated and failure to control a miscreant attorney who obviously and continually violated  the rules of conduct.